DATE: Friday 24 January 2020
LOCATION: Location 42 Petit
SLOT: 10.30
ORGANISED BY: Professors of Law, Economics and Financing, University of Luxembourg
MEDIATOR: Juraj Sajfert
SPEAKERS: Katalin Ligeti, University of Luxembourg (LU); Anna Moscibroda, DG SIMPLY (EU); Lani Cossette, Microsoft (BE); Frank Schuermans, Supervisory Body for Authorities Details (BE)
Panel Description
AI can make forecasts about where, when, and by whom criminal activities are most likely to be devoted. AI can likewise approximate how most likely it is that a suspect, accused or found guilty flees or devotes additional criminal offenses. Versus the background that AI assists predictive policing and predictive justice, what should the EU’s legal and policy actions be, in specific after the adoption of the Expert system Ethics Standards? One method is to rely on the vigor of just recently embraced information security laws -in specific, Police Regulation (EU) 2016/680 Another method would be to release a regulative reform procedure, either in or out of the classical information defense world. This panel will take a look at the effectiveness and dependability of AI for criminal justice and will seriously asses the various regulative opportunities the brand-new European Commission may think about.
– How does the concept of “credible AI” equate into the location of criminal law?
– Should we not prohibit using predictive policing systems or using AI in criminal law cases, on the basis of principles?
– Does the brand-new European Commission strategy to propose legislation in this location? If yes, what would be the goals of such brand-new laws? Should the stars leading such a reform be various from the ones that were leading the EU information security reform?
– Is it possible to establish predictive justice and predictive policing, and still regard the requirements of the GDPR and Instruction (EU) 2016/680?
No comments:
Post a Comment