To sign up for the 2015 course, check out https://www.edx.org/course/justice-harvardx-er22 -1 x-0
PART ONE: THE ETHICAL SIDE OF MURDER
If you needed to select in between (1) eliminating someone to conserve the lives of 5 others and (2) not doing anything despite the fact that you understood that 5 individuals would pass away right prior to your eyes if you not did anything– what would you do? What would be the best thing to do? Thats the theoretical situation Teacher Michael Sandel utilizes to release his course on ethical thinking. After most of trainees elect eliminating the a single person in order to conserve the lives of 5 others, Sandel provides 3 comparable ethical dilemmas– every one artfully developed to decide harder. As trainees withstand protect their conflicting options, it ends up being clear that the presumptions behind our ethical thinking are frequently inconsistent, and the concern of what is ideal and what is incorrect is not constantly black and white.
SEQUEL: THE CASE FOR CANNIBALISM
Sandel presents the concepts of practical thinker, Jeremy Bentham, with a popular 19th century legal case including a shipwrecked team of 4. After nineteen days lost at sea, the captain chooses to eliminate the weakest among them, the young cabin young boy, so that the rest can eat his blood and body to endure. The case establishes a class dispute about the ethical credibility of utilitarianism– and its teaching that the best thing to do is whatever produces “the best great for the best number.”.
http://criminaljusticecourses.net/justice-whats-the-right-thing-to-do-episode-01-the-ethical-side-of-murder/
No comments:
Post a Comment